Encoding Categorical and Coordinate Spatial Relations Without Input-Output Correlations: New Simulation Models
نویسندگان
چکیده
Cook (1995) criticized Kosslyn, Chabris, Marsolek, & Koenig’s (1992) network simulation models of spatial relations encoding in part because the absolute position of a stimulus in the input array was correlated with its spatial relation to a landmark; thus, on at least some trials, the networks did not need to compute spatial relations. The network models reported here include larger input arrays, which allow stimuli to appear in a large range of locations with an equal probability of being above or below a “bar,” thus eliminating the confound present in earlier models, The results confirm the original hypothesis that as the size of the network’s receptive fields increases, performance on a coordinate spatial relations task (which requires computing precise, metric distance) will be relatively better than on a categorical spatial relations task (which requires computing above/below relative to a landmark).
منابع مشابه
Neural Network Models as Evidence for Different Types of Visual Representations
Cook (1995) criticizes the work of Jacobs ond Kosslyn (1994) on spatial relations, shape representations, and receptive fields in neural network models on the grounds that first-order correlations between input and output unit activities con explain the results. We reply briefly ta Cook’s orguments here (ond in Kosslyn, Chabris, Morsolek, Jacobs, & Koenig, 1995) and discuss how new simulations ...
متن کاملVarying the scope of attention alters the encoding of categorical and coordinate spatial relations.
Two types of representations can be used to specify spatial relations: Coordinate spatial relations representations specify the precise distance between two objects, whereas categorical spatial relations representations assign a category (such as above or below) to specify a spatial relation between two objects. Computer simulation models suggest that coordinate spatial relations representation...
متن کاملOn the hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial relations: a review of the current evidence.
This article reviews current evidence on the hemispheric specialization hypothesis for two types of spatial relations representations; categorical versus coordinate [Psychol. Rev. 94 (1987) 148; J. Exp. Psychol.: Percept. Perform. 15 (1989) 723]. Categorical representations capture general properties of the spatial structure of a visual stimulus, without defining the exact metric properties. Co...
متن کاملDistinct neural networks underlie encoding of categorical versus coordinate spatial relations during active navigation
It has been proposed that spatial relations are encoded either categorically, such that the relative positions of objects are defined in prepositional terms; or in terms of visual coordinates, such that the precise distances between objects are represented. In humans, it has been assumed that a left hemisphere neural network subserves categorical representations, and that coordinate representat...
متن کاملRetinotopic Mapping of Categorical and Coordinate Spatial Relation Processing in Early Visual Cortex
Spatial relations are commonly divided in two global classes. Categorical relations concern abstract relations which define areas of spatial equivalence, whereas coordinate relations are metric and concern exact distances. Categorical and coordinate relation processing are thought to rely on at least partially separate neurocognitive mechanisms, as reflected by differential lateralization patte...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Cognitive Science
دوره 23 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1999